The Concept of Platform Capitalism as an Analytical Tool for Studying Creativity in the Digital Age: the Ukrainian Context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/2306-3971-2025-02-31-31Keywords:
platform capitalism, knowledge capitalization, creativity, digital labor, monetization of creativityAbstract
The article examines the transformation of creative labor in the digital economy through the prism of platform capitalism (Srnicek) and knowledge capitalization (Leydesdorff) concepts. The authors analyze how digital platforms (YouTube, TikTok, Spotify, Patreon, etc.) not only provide the infrastructure for content distribution, but also actively intervene in the processes of its formation, setting the logic of algorithmic management, standardization, and monetization of creativity. Particular attention is paid to the Ukrainian context: the platformization of creative labor is taking place in conditions of war, “digital mobilization” of culture, institutional instability, and infrastructural vulnerability, which requires specific adaptation of Western models of analysis to local realities. The authors demonstrate that platforms transform not only the forms of creativity, but also their socio-economic significance: creativity becomes a source of data, an economic unit, and an object of exploitation. At the same time, it loses its autonomy, finding itself within new forms of digital inequality. Using the example of Ukrainian startups, educational initiatives, and creative studios (particularly in the UNIT.City environment), the authors show how the “knowledge economy” is realized in the form of digital products based on scientific developments, cultural content, and algorithmic logic. The proposed perspective opens broad opportunities for further empirical research, including the study of the specifics of interaction between platforms, creators, and audiences in the context of Ukraine’s digital post-war reality. This includes analyzing new forms of cultural production in digital ecosystems, the dynamics of income distribution, transformations in the professional strategies of creators, and the impact of algorithmic selection on the visibility and diversity of content. All this creates a foundation for developing more equitable models for the functioning of the creative economy in the digital age.
References
Bucher, T. (2018). If...Then: Algorithmic Power and Politics. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190493028.001.0001
Chuprii, L. V., Skokova, L. H., & Nastoiascha, K. V. (2021). Analytical report of the comprehensive sociological study “Cultural practices of the population of Ukraine”. Youth Democratic Initiatives NGO. Funded by the Ukrainian Cultural Foundation. Retrieved August 10, 2025 from https://uaculture.ucf.in.ua/research/kompleksne-socziologichne-doslidzhennya-kulturnyh-praktyk-naselennya-ukrayiny/
Cotter, K. (2019). Playing the visibility game: How digital influencers and algorithms negotiate influence on Instagram. New Media & Society, 21(4), 895–913. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818815684
Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford University Press.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix-University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge-Based Economic Development. EASST Review, 14(1), 14–19.
Fuchs, C. (2014). Digital labour and Karl Marx. New York: Routledge. Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of “platforms”. New Media & Society, 12(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342738
Kenney, M., & Zysman, J. (2016). The Rise of the Platform Economy. Issues in Science and Technology, 32(3), 61–69.
Khalil, J. F., & Zayani, M. (2021). De-territorialized digital capitalism and the predicament of the nation-state: Netflix in Arabia. Media, Culture & Society, 43(2), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720932505
Kunwar, R. R., & Ulak, N. (2023). Understanding the Triple Helix Model and Capitalization of Knowledge. Journal of APF Command and Staff College, 6(01), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.3126/japfcsc.v6i01.57573
Langley, P., & Leyshon, A. (2017). Platform capitalism: The intermediation and capitalisation of digital economic circulation. Finance and Society, 3(1), 11–31. https://doi.org/10.2218/finsoc.v3i1.1936
Leydesdorff, L. (2010). The knowledge-based economy and the Triple Helix model. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 44(1), 367–417. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2010.1440440116
Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The Triple Helix as a Model for Innovation Studies. Science and Public Policy, 25(3), 195–203.
Liang, Y., Aroles, J., & Brandl, B. (2022). Charting platform capitalism: Definitions, concepts and ideologies. New Technology, Work and Employment, 37(2), 308–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12234
Marino, S. (2024). Refugees’ Storytelling Strategies on Digital Media Platforms: How the Russia–Ukraine War Unfolded on TikTok. Social Media + Society, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051241279248
Mejova, Y., Capozzi, A., Monti, C., & De Francisci Morales, G. (2025). Narratives of war: Ukrainian memetic warfare on Twitter. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1145/3711037
Narayan, D. (2022). Platform capitalism and cloud infrastructure: Theorizing a hyper-scalable computing regime. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 54(5), 911–929. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X221094028
Nate, S. (Ed.). (2025). Ukraine’s journey to recovery, reform and post-war reconstruction: A blueprint for security, resilience and development. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66434-2
Nieborg, D. B., & Poell, T. (2018). The platformization of cultural production: Theorizing the contingent cultural commodity. New Media & Society, 20(11), 4275–4292. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818769694
Oliinyk, D. (2025, Febr 12). Digital transformation of Ukraine’s economy in wartime. January 2025. Kyiv: NISS. Retrieved September 01, 2025 from https://niss.gov.ua/en/news/komentari-ekspertiv/digital-transformation-ukraines-economy-wartime-january-2025
PwC (2023). Global Entertainment & Media Outlook 2024–28. PwC.
Schradie, J. (2011). The digital production gap: The digital divide and Web 2.0 collide. Poetics, 39(2), 145–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2011.02.003
Srnicek, N. (2016). Platform Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Stefanovych, D. (2023). Projects and records of the Sikorsky Challenge 2023 festival Sikorsky Challenge 2023. Kyiv: National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”. https://kpi.ua/en/2023-sc?utm_source
Steinberg, M., Zhang, L., & Mukherjee, R. (2024). Platform capitalisms and platform cultures. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 28(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/13678779231223544
Terranova, T. (2000). Free labor: Producing culture for the digital economy. Social Text, 18(2), 33–58.
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. New York: PublicAffairs.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ruslan Zaporozhchenko, Artem Hrytsaienko, Vyacheslav Nikulin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


