Trust and Conflict in the Structure of Social Interaction: Theoretical Approaches and Contemporary Interpretations

Authors

  • Gulbarshyn Chepurko Institute of Sociology of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/2306-3971-2026-01-23-23

Keywords:

social interaction, trust, social trust, political trust, conflict

Abstract

The article analyzes social interaction as a fundamental mechanism for the formation of trust and conflict in contemporary society through the synthesis of conflictological, functionalist, and interactionist approaches. It is established that social interaction constitutes a primary social process within which both trust, ensuring cooperation, predictability, and integration, and conflict, performing the functions of identifying contradictions, adaptation, and social change, are formed. The generalization of scientific approaches made it possible to conceptualize trust as a multidimensional social resource operating simultaneously at interpersonal, group, and institutional levels. Particular attention is devoted to conflict as a specific form of social interaction. The study substantiates the expediency of considering conflict not only as a result of structural contradictions but also as a multidimensional process shaped by social, psychological, communicative, and institutional factors. An integrative approach to conflict analysis is proposed, combining macro-, meso-, and microsociological levels of inquiry while accounting for the dynamic and processual nature of conflict development. The scientific novelty of the research lies in the development of a comprehensive theoretical model of the interrelationship between social interaction, trust, and conflict, according to which trust and conflict are interpreted as complementary mechanisms of the functioning and transformation of the social system. It is demonstrated that under wartime conditions trust serves as a strategic resource for societal mobilization and resilience, whereas conflict may perform functions of adaptation, reconfiguration of social ties, and the formation of new models of collective interaction.

Author Biography

  • Gulbarshyn Chepurko, Institute of Sociology of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

    https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7540-5174

References

Boulding, K. E. (1963). Conflict and defense: a general theory. New York: Harper & Row. Retrieved December 10, 2025 from https://dokumen.pub/conflict-and-defense-a-general-theory-0819171123.html

Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human Nature and the Social Order. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

Coser, L. A. (1956). The Function of Social Conflict. New York: The Free Press.

Coser, L. A. (1961). The termination of conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 5(4), 347-353, December. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200276100500401

Dahrendorf, R. (1959). Class and Conflict in an Industrial Society (1st ed.). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003260257

Derhaliuk, M., Blahun, I., Shashyna, M., Pohrebniak A., Ivantsov, S., & Berezovskyi, D. (2025). Transformation of mechanisms of state management of sustainable regional development in the global space digitalization. Journal on Innovation and Sustainability, 16(3), 127-142. http://doi.org/10.23925/2179-3565.2025v16i3p54-64

Didenko, N. (2019). Philosophical and psychological problems of social interaction in the system of modern management: monograph. Kryvyi Rih: R. A. Kozlov. Retrieved January 12, 2026 from https://www.nuozu.edu.ua/zagruzka2/EB8.pdf

Dolia, I. (2025). Transformation of the Role of Civil Society in Ukraine in the Context of Full-Scale War. Sociological Studios, 2(27), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.17721/2306-3971-2025-02-12-12

Durkheim, E. (1984). The division of labour in society. London: The Macmillan Press Ltd.

Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.

Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday. Retrieved December 28, 2025 from https://archive.org/details/presentationofs00goff

Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume One: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston, Mass: Beacon Press. Retrieved December 18, 2025 from https://teddykw2.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/jurgen-habermas-theory-of-communicative-action-volume-1.pdf

Golovakha, Ye., & Panina, N. (2008). Ukrainian Society 1992–2008: Sociological Monitoring. Kyiv: Institute of Sociology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.

Homans, G. C. (1961). Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.

Ibragimova, K. (2013). Definitions concept of social interaction, its types and basic theory. Problems of engineering pedagogic education, 40–41, 289–293. Retrieved December 5, 2025 from http://library.uipa.edu.ua/images/data/zbirnik/40-41/48.pdf

Marx, K. (1976). Preface to A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. Pekin: Foreign Languages Press. Retrieved December 18, 2025 from https://msuweb.montclair.edu/~furrg/gned/marx_pref2contrib.pdf

Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.

Merton, R. K. (1968). Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press. Retrieved December 18, 2025 from https://archive.org/details/socialtheorysoci0000mert_w8x3/page/n7/mode/2up

Mishler, W., & Rose, R. (2001). What Are the Origins of Political Trust? Testing Institutional and Cultural Theories in Post-communist Societies. Comparative Political Studies, 34(1), 30–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414001034001002

Park, R. E. (1950). Race and Culture. Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press. Retrieved December 8, 2025 from https://archive.org/details/raceculture0000park/page/n3/mode/2up

Parsons, T. (1949). The Structure of Social Action. Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press. Retrieved December 9, 2025 from https://archive.org/details/dli.ernet.4397

Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System. London: Routledge& Kegan Paul. Retrieved December 19, 2025 from https://voidnetwork.gr/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/The-Social-System-by-Talcott-Parsons.pdf

Parsons, T. (1966). The Structure of Social Action. New York: The Free Press.

Parsons, T. (1971). The System of Modern Societies. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. Retrieved December 11, 2025 from https://archive.org/details/systemofmodernso0000unse

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. NY: Simon & Schuster. https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990

Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nonetti, R. Y. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7s8r7

Simmel, G. (1955). Conflict and the web of group-affiliations. NY: Free Press.

Sorokin, P. (1931). Social and Cultural Dynamics: Vol. I. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd. Retrieved December 10, 2025 from https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.282833/page/n3/mode/2up?q=solidarity

Sztompka, P. (1994). The Sociology of Social Change. Oxford: Blackwell.

Turner, J., & Turner, P. (1998). The Structure of Sociological Theory. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company. DOI: 10.2307/3340022

Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (G. Roth & C. Wittich, Eds.). Berkeley: University of California Press.

Published

25.06.2026

Issue

Section

THEORETICAL PROVISIONS OF SOCIOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS

How to Cite

Chepurko, G. (2026). Trust and Conflict in the Structure of Social Interaction: Theoretical Approaches and Contemporary Interpretations. Sociological Studios, 1(28), 30-43. https://doi.org/10.17721/2306-3971-2026-01-23-23

Most read articles by the same author(s)