Approaches to the Аnalysis of Data with Nonresponse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29038/2306-3971-2013-02-64-70Keywords:
nonresponse, missing data, methods of analysis of data with nonresponse, modelAbstract
The discrepancy between the need for analysis of non-response and a generalized information about the nature of a different kind of missing data are updated by the consideration of the basic methods of analysis of non-response in empirical social science research. Given that the non-response analysis methods have different mechanisms for their implementation, and are caused by the further analysis and interpretation of data, the researcher proposed to define a method for analyzing data from non-responses: either 1) remove the non-response and to implement procedures for data analysis, ignoring them, or fill in the blanks using a certain method; 2) simple or complex methods of data imputation; 3) weighing; 4) mathematical modeling. The study shows not only the classification methods, but compared the advantages and disadvantages of each.
References
1. Злоба Е. Статистические методы восстановления пропущенных данных / Е. Злоба, И. Яцкив // Computer Modeling & New Technologies. – 2002. – Vol. 6. – № 1. – С. 51–61.
2. Литтл Р. Дж. А. Статистический анализ данных с пропусками. / Р. Дж. А. Литтл, Д. Б. Рубин // Статистический анализ данных с пропусками. – М. : Финансы и статистика, 1990. – 336 с.
3. Снитюк В. Е. Эволюционный метод восстановления пропусков в данных / В. Е. Снитюк // Интеллектуальный анализ информации : материалы междунар. конф. – Киев, 2006. – С. 262–271.
4. Сорока Ю. Г. «Отказ от багатства» и изменения в социальном восприятии неравенства / Ю. Г. Сорока, Т. С. Зуб // Соціологія: теорія, методи, маркетинг. – 2008. – № 1. – С. 222–236.
5. Толстова Ю. Н. Анализ социологических данных: методология, дескриптивная статистика, изучение связей между номинальными признаками / Ю. Н. Толстова. – М. : Науч. мир, 2000. – 352 с.
6. Groves R. Experiments in Producing Nonresponse Error / R. Groves, M. Couper, S. Presser, E. Singer, R. Tourangeau, G. Piani, L. Nelson // Public Opinion Quarterly. – 2006. – Vol. 70. – № 5. – Р. 720–736.
7. Leeuw Е. Prevention and Treatment of Item Nonresponse / E. Leeuw, J. Hox, M. Huisman // Journal of Official Statistics. – 2003. – Vol. 19. – № 2. – Р. 153–176.
8. Lynn P. Extended field efforts to reduce the risk of non-response bias: do they pay off? / P. Lynn, J. Hall, V. Brown, G. Nicolaas // ISER working Paper Series, 2011. – № 24. – 31 p.
9. Marsden Peter V. Handbook of survey research. 2nd edition / P. V. Marsden, J. D. Wright. – Emerald Group Publishing, 2010. – 886 p.
10. Singer E. Nonresponse bias in household surveys / E. Singer // Public Opinion Quarterly. – 2006. – Vol. 70. – № 5. – Р. 637–645.
11. Thomsen I. On the causes and effects of non-response: Norwegian Experiences / I. Thomsen, E. Siring. – Central Bureau of Statistics, Norway : Oslo. – 1980. – 52 р.
12. Yansaneh I. Construction and use of sample weights / I. Yansaneh // Draft Handbook on Designing of Household Sample Surveys. – 2003. – P. 1–14.
